2012Consult...is
a newsletter designed to offer you
ONE SOURCE for receiving the varied
information relating to our current world
affairs and "changes."
The only constant in the upcoming years will
be "Change" and how you deal with it.
To take the appropriate steps regarding this
change, you need information. You cannot
trust your fate by relying on the
"historical past" because the scenario we
are now facing has never happened before.
Never before
in the history of the world has one date,
one moment in time, been so significant to
so many cultures, so many religions, so many
scientists, so many governments and to so
many people all around the world.
We are a "One
Stop Shopping" website that will
give you the latest, up-to-date
practical & metaphysical information
regarding the current as well as
upcoming changes affecting the planet
from politics to the price of gold, from
earth changes to ET's. We will offer you
a spectrum of information - and
depending upon your level of
indoctrination, some of it you may agree
with it & some of it you may
not... it's up to you. And of course we
will incorporate humor... lots of humor
- life is to short!
2012Consult's
primary goal is designed to inform you so
that you may make the right decisions for
yourself and your family during a time of
"Shifting" changes.
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
|
ChemTrails
- Are they Real?
It
is officially called stratospheric Geo-engineering. Some
call it chemtrails. What ever the name, there is crap in
our skies - you just have to look up to see it. The
residues, mainly aluminum and barium, are now found in
our drinking water. We are breathing it - are you
wondering why Alzheimer is increasing so rapidly? - and
it is compromising organic farming? Curiously enough,
genetically modified seeds are made resistant to
aluminum. Is someone having an agenda ?
On February 10th, 2010,
Geo-engineers proposed spraying 10 - 20 millions metric
tons of aluminum per year into our atmosphere for the
stated goal of "cooling the planet" - while we can
observe that many areas around the world are cooling
down. This proposition would allow the concerned
corporations to make billions of profit. Finally,
someone is making a movie about this subject that
concerns all of us.
Being informed about this subject is very
important to raise global awareness - however, please
remember that you are attracting more of what you are
focusing on. So for our collective well-being, please
focus on clean and clear blue skies, not on the toxicity
of the phenomenon!
|
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
Montana
Hotdog Holder
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
|
American Perceptions of China...
At the recent NOW10 Conference
sponsored by the prestigious Brown Advisory Group in
Baltimore, we had the pleasure to hear keynote James Fallows
(editor for The Atlantic) speak on the truisms and myths of
China.
Not too many westerners can claim the relationship James has
with China. He lived there for six years, and traveled
everywhere in the country but Tibet. He addressed aspects of
China that he said most of us probably didn't know...
including where he himself changed his thinking once he
spent time there.
Curiously, he began by coughing.
James
told us that he just returned from China the day before...
and that it always takes him a few days to cough out the
crud in his system from visiting there.
James described western perceptions more 'off center' than
false. And that our thinking needs to be recalibrated. The
perception of the Chinese of themselves and their
relationship to their country and to the West is much
different.
Let's take a look at common American perceptions of China.
But recalibrate them by adding in James' experience of
living and working there.
-
In the West, we view China as a big, coherent unified
government like we see reflected by the Olympics Opening
Ceremonies in Beijing. But China is normally
chaotic. Most Chinese citizens feel this way.
Their reaction to the Olympics Opening Ceremony was
closer to "I can't believe our government actually
pulled that off." Think of China like a continent, like
the EU. It's more an assemblage of highly individual
peoples. And like Americans, the Chinese are much more
absorbed by their own tensions in their own local
communities than caring about the West.
-
There are areas where the Chinese government can "swing
its arm" quickly and get the job done, like cracking
down on the media. But not everywhere, certainly not
when it comes to cleaning up their environment.
What about the Communist Party? There are
really no Communists in China anymore. Westerners should
just change that word to "Incumbents." There is no
threat in China to "One Party Rule". The main threat to
that party is still rural poverty, which could lead to a
revolt. For every conflict in China, the party has this
approach - Plan A: Placate. Plan B: Repress. In the case
of any revolt, they'll just go to Plan B.
-
Is China the "land of the future"? Maybe.
Their GDP growth was 11.9% year-over-year in the first
quarter. But their GDP is still only $4.9 trillion
compared to the U.S. $14.3 trillion. The Chinese are
aware they have enormous problems to overcome. Too many
people still don't have indoor plumbing... more than the
entire population of the United States. In the West, we
think of China's potential like this: "Take our markets
and multiply everything by 1.3 Billion." The Chinese
think of their resources like this: "Divide everything
by 1.3 Billion".
-
The Chinese do not feel they are the Paymasters
of the U.S. They feel they are hostage to our
economy.
-
Is China a "Big Brother" State?
Twenty-five years ago it was a "police state" with a lot
of monitoring. Not so much today. There are still
certain controls that are overbearing... media,
political dissention. But then there are many controls
that are too lax... just ask anyone about the traffic
controls there. The truth is that the role of politics
in China is often 80% of what we read about there. But
it's maybe only 2% of what the Chinese are reading
about.
-
In America, we combine Liberty and Democracy as
if they are the same word. The reality is we
are often more interested in democracy than personal
liberties. The Chinese are the opposite.
-
Is China a "soft power," quietly replacing the
western economic model? There's nothing soft
about it. They are blatantly trying to do just that.
Should China revalue their currency?
Yes, and they will. But what we have to understand is
they don't want to do it in response to U.S. pressure.
What about Chinese real estate?
Isn't that another bubble that could effect the global
markets? It's more of a problem for the Tier
One cities in China... and James doubts it could be a
global problem. The Chinese have the resources to bail
themselves out when they need to. What about
their higher education, and surplus of engineers?
No, academia is more of a problem in China than
in the United States. They have a long way to go to
catch up to our quality of academia, at least at the
university level. No important research has ever come
out and been ranked by any Chinese university, and there
are profound problems of academic corruption.
-
Is China becoming the "hard power" of the world? Is
their military power expanding? China actually
has a long way to go to catch up militarily.
The last real engagement for them was in Vietnam. It was
an enormous loss for the Chinese. They lost more
soldiers in a single day than the U.S. has lost in the
last twelve years. And what about Taiwan?
James sees Taiwan as the only possible catalyst to a war
or real crisis between the U.S. and China. It's a very
dangerous issue. We should all hope it's contained for a
long time. What about nuclear proliferation?
It's hard to know what China will do, because it's a
genuine dilemma for the Chinese. They don't know what to
do. North Korea and Iran will be the two test cases.
-
Will China's growth eventually become a huge problem for
the U.S.? Yes, it's possible. But not inevitable.
Fallows closed his talk with another cough, and
summed it up this way:
"Our relationship with China is mutually
beneficial. It is not a zero-sum game. But as in every
long-term relationship, there will be times we disagree.
By far the gravest problem for China and for the West is
environmental collaboration."
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
|
_________________________________________________ |
SILVER, GOLD AND THE IRS
By
Derry Brownfield
I
began a recent presentation before a large group of
cattle producers (R-CALFUSA) by showing a paper dollar
bill and a silver coin. The words "one dollar" is
inscribed on both the coin and the paper, yet the paper
dollar will only pay for about one quart of gasoline at
today's prices, while the silver dollar will pay for
well over five gallons. I explained to my audience that
consumer prices are not high - the paper dollar has lost
most of its value. It makes no difference how high the
price of gasoline goes, a silver dollar will continue to
buy gas for 20 cents a gallon, exactly the price gas was
during the Great Depression. Based on 1940 prices, a
paper dollar is worth about two pennies.
Today in America, we are being systematically robbed of
our property because we have allowed the Federal Reserve
to flood our banks with fiat, worthless paper money.
There is actually a law against paper money but nobody
seems to know about it. The Supreme law of the land is
the US Constitution, which stated in Article I Section
10: Individual states are "not allowed to make any
things but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of
debts." The Constitution also states that "Congress has
the power to COIN money and regulate the value thereof."
Our Founding Fathers knew how a central bank printing
paper money would collapse our economy. Had we followed
the US Constitution to the full letter of the law,
gasoline would still be 20 cents a gallon. As the dollar
continues to lose value we say our currency has lost its
purchasing power. It should be more properly referred to
as embezzlement by the banking industry.
Robert Kahre owns a family business and instead of using
paper money he paid his workers with gold and silver
coins minted by the United States government. He paid
them based on the "face value" of the coins. If he paid
a worker a dollar an hour he paid with a silver dollar,
which states on the coin that it is "one dollar"
regardless of today's value. His wages were so low that
he didn't have to file W-2 income tax forms or withhold
taxes or pay workman's comp. This upset the IRS, which
charged him and his family with 161 federal tax crimes.
The
case which was tried before a Las Vegas jury in a
Federal Court, heard testimony for almost four months.
Defendants believed they had no legal obligation to
withhold, pay income taxes or report anything to the
government because the "face value" of the gold and
silver coins is so small as to fall beneath the
reporting thresholds set by the Internal Revenue Code.
The government argued that the payments in gold and
silver US coins must be considered at their bullion,
full-market value when considering the worth of the
wages for purposes of the IRS code. The essence of the
argument is that Congress is obligated by law to mint
and circulate such coins as demand requires, and must
establish the value of coins as they are used as legal
tender, but a coin's market value is a distinct,
separate attribute of such coins and is of no legal
consequence if the coins are used as legal tender. If a
worker is paid with such coins, his taxable income can
only be the face value indicated on the coin. "A coin
dollar is worth no more for the purposes of tender in
payment of an ordinary debt than a note dollar. The law
has not made the note a standard of value anymore than
coin. It is true that in the market, as an article of
merchandise, one is of greater value than the other; but
as money, as a medium of exchange, the law knows no
difference between them."
On
September 17, the jury returned its verdict refusing to
convict all nine defendants of any of the 161 federal
tax crimes they had been charged with. One would think,
"we the tax payers would want to hear that the IRS was
defeated by the use of the true money." To my knowledge,
the results of this trial were never printed or
broadcast by any of the major news media. Three days
after the trial's conclusion, the Las Vegas Review
Journal ran its first and last story about the outcome
and then only because of public pressure from interested
parties who attended the trial.
The
Department of Justice prosecutors know that justice was
done and that if this information was made available to
the general public their house of cards would come
tumbling down. All federal agencies have a great fear of
the truth and only by controlling the news media can
they keep the world from caving in on their heads.
©
2008 Derry Brownfield - All Rights Reserved
http://www.newswithviews.com/brownfield/brownfielda.htm
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
The economy is
getting better, right?
Here
are some numbers presented humorously - but accurately.
In two minutes, you'll know more about what's really
going on than from reading every issue of the Wall
Street Journal from cover to cover.
Click here for video
|
|
_________________________________________________ |
|
~Quote
of the Day~
Great leadership
arises out of great conflict
~ James MacGregor Burns
Hard work pays off
in the future; laziness pays off now
I
intend to live forever.... so far, so good |
|
|